Real Ahrefs + DataForSEO data on Anysphere's AI code editor — domain snapshot, top-traffic keywords,
competitor gap vs GitHub Copilot, live Google SERP for the highest-value commercial query, and a
concrete 2x organic-traffic plan for the next 90 days.
Generated end-to-end by Sarah using TeamDay's SeoResearch tool.
Traffic value: $80,525/mo equivalent organic — what Cursor would pay Google to buy this traffic. US scope, subdomains included.
| Keyword | Position | Volume | Est. traffic / mo | KD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cursor ai | #1 | 53,000 | 19,279 | 51 |
| cursor pricing | #1 | 17,000 | 7,579 | 51 |
| cursor | #1 | 96,000 | 6,342 | 61 |
| cursor student | #1 | 4,700 | 3,035 | 30 |
| cursor ide | #1 | 6,100 | 2,212 | 22 |
| cursor logo | #1 | 3,200 | 1,580 | 1 |
| cursor ai code editor | #1 | 3,100 | 1,450 | 64 |
| cursor cli | #1 | 3,000 | 1,411 | 6 |
| cursor download | #1 | 1,400 | 1,394 | 59 |
| what is cursor ai | #1 | 3,100 | 1,182 | 47 |
| cursor ai pricing | #1 | 2,100 | 1,135 | 55 |
| cursor rules | #1 | 2,800 | 1,057 | 33 |
| cursor mcp | #1 | 2,100 | 1,056 | 21 |
| cursor student discount | #1 | 1,500 | 1,026 | 7 |
Cursor's traffic is heavily branded — the top 14 keywords are all "cursor" or "cursor X" variants. This is a brand-fortress profile, not a category-capture profile.
GitHub Copilot's top-traffic keywords. Cursor either doesn't rank or ranks far below — the obvious gap is the unbranded "copilot"-style generic AI-coding queries that Microsoft owns by default. Cursor wins its name, Copilot wins the category.
| Keyword | Copilot ranks | Cursor ranks | Volume | KD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| github copilot | #2 | not in top 100 | 128,000 | 79 |
| copilot ai | #5 | not in top 100 | 279,000 | 87 |
| ai copilot | #2 | not in top 100 | 17,000 | 88 |
| copilot chat | #4 | not in top 100 | 14,000 | 81 |
| copilot pro | #3 | not in top 100 | 6,900 | 74 |
| copilot cli | #1 | cursor cli #1 (own brand only) | 3,700 | 41 |
| github copilot pricing | #1 | not in top 100 | 3,800 | 59 |
| github copilot x | #2 | not in top 100 | 7,600 | 69 |
Other competitors by shared keywords: github.com (1,253), microsoft.com (1,134), stackoverflow.com (822), visualstudio.com (570), jetbrains.com (348), openai.com (448). Cursor competes against the entire IDE + dev-docs ecosystem.
Pages already indexed and within striking distance. Pushing these into top 3 is cheaper than attacking new SERPs.
| Keyword | Position | Volume | KD | Best URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| michael truell | #8 | 9,800 | 22 | /blog/third-era |
| coding ai | #7 | 7,200 | 80 | / |
| openspec | #7 | 6,300 | 4 | forum thread |
| sonnet 4.6 | #13 | 7,700 | 31 | /docs/models/claude-4-6-sonnet |
| claude sonnet 4.6 | #17 | 11,000 | 33 | /docs/models/claude-4-6-sonnet |
| anysphere | #11 | 13,000 | 22 | / |
| composer | #15 | 15,000 | 77 | /blog/composer |
Highest commercial-intent category query Cursor competes for. Volume 1,600/mo · KD 83 · traffic potential 54,000 (whole topic cluster). Cursor sits at #2 — moving to #1 unlocks a meaningful share of the cluster.
| # | Title · URL | DR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | I tried every AI code editor so you don't have to youtube.com — video pack | — |
| #2 | Cursor: The best way to code with AI cursor.com | 89 |
| #3 | Best AI Code Editors 2026 (I Tested 10+) playcode.io | 70 |
| #4 | Best AI Coding Agents Summer 2025 medium.com | 94 |
| #5 | Visual Studio Code — open source AI code editor code.visualstudio.com | 92 |
| #6 | Online Code Editor · AI Cloud IDE codeanywhere.com | 70 |
| #7 | Reddit threads — r/java, r/nocode, r/ChatGPTCoding 3 reddit results in discussion pack | 95 |
| #8 | OpenCode — open source AI coding agent opencode.ai | 79 |
| #9 | The AI Code Editor You've Been Waiting For replit.com | 87 |
| #10 | 12 AI Code Generators Tested: Which Is Best? (2026) prismic.io | 87 |
| Keyword | Volume | KD | Traffic potential |
|---|---|---|---|
| vibe coding | 81,000 | 69 | 34,000 |
| ai code editor | 1,600 | 83 | 54,000 |
| claude code | 183,000 | 73 | 37,000 |
| windsurf | 38,000 | 44 | 18,000 |
| ai ide | 2,200 | 37 | 2,800 |
| ai coding assistant | 3,000 | 71 | 250 |
| cursor vs copilot | 2,400 | 7 | 350 |
| cursor vs windsurf | 2,900 | 37 | 500 |
Traffic potential = the sum of traffic the #1 ranking page captures across the whole keyword cluster. Cursor currently captures almost none of "vibe coding" or "claude code" — both gigantic adjacent SERPs.
Cursor's current US organic baseline is ~74,500 visits/month. Target by day 90: ~150,000/month. Five concrete plays, ranked by uplift / effort. Each play is bound to specific URLs, current positions, target positions, and Ahrefs traffic potential.
+25,000–34,000 visits/mo at target position #1–3 (Ahrefs cluster TP = 34,000).
+8,000–12,000 visits/mo from head-term promotion + comparison capture.
+6,000–9,000 visits/mo as positions move from 13–17 → 3–7 (CTR ~6× lift).
+10,000–15,000 visits/mo realistic capture from 5–10% share of TP.
+4,000–6,000 visits/mo from branded entity consolidation.